Don't you think the juxtaposition, even if hyperbolic, does serve to initiate the conversation of how to avoid getting to that point? Thinking of "what's the difference?" as an actual question, not a rhetorical one, is where you get the one on the left to justify their position.
Of course, if one considers guns, religion and patriotism as anti-thetical to society as terrorism, then it's not even a matter of degrees; they're both demonstrating anti-social behaviour that should be condemned.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 01:28 pm (UTC)Of course, if one considers guns, religion and patriotism as anti-thetical to society as terrorism, then it's not even a matter of degrees; they're both demonstrating anti-social behaviour that should be condemned.