When we figure out a way to put leadership and direction into a computer and push it that way, we may see a difference in how these things are quantified. We might actually see that sooner rather than later.
Presumably, ownership will keep its place and continue to take the money. I suppose you mean that it is conceivable that CEOs and much of the executive class might feel some of the marginalization that workers have been feeling, in the same way that there is some concern that professionals, such as lawyers, are beginning to feel the threat. This would seem to suggest that instead of talking about the 1%, we'll be taking about the 0.00001 percent.
I fail to see how making workers more dependent somehow helps them.
We're just missing each other here. I thought Republicans were upset that more workers may voluntarily work less, and I assume that these workers would be working less precisely because they are not as thoroughly dependent on their bosses. Previously, aside from wages and salaries, a worker was more bound to a job because that job was also the key to his health insurance, but this now seems to be less the case, and hence the controversy.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 05:12 pm (UTC)Presumably, ownership will keep its place and continue to take the money. I suppose you mean that it is conceivable that CEOs and much of the executive class might feel some of the marginalization that workers have been feeling, in the same way that there is some concern that professionals, such as lawyers, are beginning to feel the threat. This would seem to suggest that instead of talking about the 1%, we'll be taking about the 0.00001 percent.
I fail to see how making workers more dependent somehow helps them.
We're just missing each other here. I thought Republicans were upset that more workers may voluntarily work less, and I assume that these workers would be working less precisely because they are not as thoroughly dependent on their bosses. Previously, aside from wages and salaries, a worker was more bound to a job because that job was also the key to his health insurance, but this now seems to be less the case, and hence the controversy.