So his first line item is something that doesn't even account for 10% of the debt, and assumes that the wars, as opposed to all the spending, was "unpaid for."
His second line item assumes incorrectly that tax cuts have a cost. They do not - the spending was the problem.
The third still assumes that Wall Street, and not the regulatory structure, caused the recession. He also cites "illegal behavior" without pointing out what illegal behavior occurred.
Yes, please, I hope he keeps talking. The more the left shows their ass like this, the better off the rest of us are.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2011-11-19 05:01 pm (UTC)His second line item assumes incorrectly that tax cuts have a cost. They do not - the spending was the problem.
The third still assumes that Wall Street, and not the regulatory structure, caused the recession. He also cites "illegal behavior" without pointing out what illegal behavior occurred.
Yes, please, I hope he keeps talking. The more the left shows their ass like this, the better off the rest of us are.