Didn't say they were the biggest but they are among the reddest, most sinfully animal feed vs human food growing, states in the OP. But they're not the ones that will be all out of water next year. Why criticize them on how they use their water when they're not the ones running out?
Didn't say they were ...states in the OP... Why criticize them
There wasn't any criticizing of anything. And the op didn't state anything. Your first comment jumped the shark and made all sorts of assumptions. and you started concern trolling from then on.
Oh please, that red/green chart is all about trying to paint aimal feed as wasteful in an effort to make California look less wreckless about their water (at least they're feeding people). I'm the concern troll? Ha.
47% of California’s water footprint is related to meat and dairy production. No one in California who cares about water is blind to meat production. 10% of water in California is used for almonds compared to just alfalfa alone, a livestock feed crop, uses 15 percent.
no subject
no subject
There wasn't any criticizing of anything. And the op didn't state anything.
Your first comment jumped the shark and made all sorts of assumptions. and you started concern trolling from then on.
no subject
no subject
no subject
47% of California’s water footprint is related to meat and dairy production. No one in California who cares about water is blind to meat production. 10% of water in California is used for almonds compared to just alfalfa alone, a livestock feed crop, uses 15 percent.