[identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems like a pattern. I expected this to be the case behind the VA scandal as well: in their desire to cut spending, the Republicans slash these budgets, but when it hits the fan (if it's under a Democratic White House), they go all self-righteous.

[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Playing politics?

Shocked! Shocked I say!

[identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, but on this particular kind of play, I'm surprised that the Democrats don't hit back harder and immediately: "You deny us the resources, favoring tax cuts for the rich - we cannot make a feast of two fishes and two loaves."

[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Democrats don't seem particularly good at hitting back, in general, let alone harder and faster.

[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
"Romnesia" may have been well played, but it was definitely late in the game.

[identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)
But... I just read a few days ago how Obama's "superior campaigning" won him election twice despite 'Merica being more conservative. Surely we liberals can't just be geniuses at tricking people into voting for Presidents and terrible at the rest of the propaganda game.

[identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com 2014-06-27 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
You just can't beat that ground game!

[identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com 2014-06-26 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Or even ask what they were doing in the first place:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line

[identity profile] madam-shapo.livejournal.com 2014-06-27 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
In case somebody cares to know the details:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/barbara-boxers-claim-that-gop-budgets-hampered-benghazi-security/2013/05/15/d1e295cc-bdb0-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_blog.html

The teenager drinks too much, so the father cuts his allowance. The teenager still buys the booze, but has no money to buy food. So he claims that his father is trying to starve him to death. The claim is:
1. True
2. False

[identity profile] mjlegel.livejournal.com 2014-06-27 10:39 am (UTC)(link)
Typical silly analogy ... if you have a problem with the teenager drinking you deal with that ... not by doing something entirely different. But of course for pols who think everything is about money they think cutting budgets will create real world solutions when all it does is cut budgets to a lot of things we would like to have. Like embassy security.

[identity profile] madam-shapo.livejournal.com 2014-06-27 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
How about the pols who thinks that all the problems can be solved by throwing more money on them? Aren't they the ones who thinks that everything about money?

[identity profile] catlin.livejournal.com 2014-06-29 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Soldiers need paid. They don't work for free. Security needs money, it too won't happen for free.