I'd like to think this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Jimmy_Carter#Arab-Israeli_Conflict.2FCamp_David_Accords) was a major factor in getting Carter that Nobel prize... and all of his work after his presidency too. I know you don't like him, but Carter is the hardest working ex-President. He's not going around giving speeches and cashing checks (*cough (http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/bush-headlining-motivational-mega-show-with-inspirational-firepower.php)*), he's out there working toward his beliefs, be it for Habitats for Humanity or other causes.
PS- Climate change denier? Looks like somebody's angling for a top spot in the Chamber of Commerce...
I'm sure you would like to think that. I'm sure that the announcement of the award coming only hours after the U.S. House and Senate gave President George W. Bush authorization to use military force against Iraq in order to enforce U.N. Security Council resolutions requiring that Baghdad give up weapons of mass destruction had absolutely nothing to do with it.
Chamber of Commerce eh? I always like to keep my options open.
Yea, who can imagine why they might give a Peace Prize to the guy trying to stop a preemptive, unnecessary war instead of the guy who was starting it? Gosh, it just boggles the mind.
In all fairness, I don't think there's anything wrong with Bush using his position as ex-President to give speeches and cash checks. I believe his background is in business, and ex-Presidents don't really have an obligation to continue peacemaking work after they're out of office.
no subject
PS- Climate change denier? Looks like somebody's angling for a top spot in the Chamber of Commerce...
no subject
Chamber of Commerce eh? I always like to keep my options open.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject