the number dose matter, in a lot of ways. one, nukes are expencive, and the more there are, the more chance here is that there could be a fuck up.
and, there is also the nuklear non prolfration treaty, witch said that those signtors who had nukes would eventuly get rid of them.
lets not forgot the us has all its icbms, plus the sub lanched missless. and sub lanched missless are far more diffcult to take out. its why there used. so its not like a redunction in the number of warheads is gona screw the US over, and ideed, it may lead the way to starting a decomsoning proses to help meet the non prolfration treaty.
no subject
and, there is also the nuklear non prolfration treaty, witch said that those signtors who had nukes would eventuly get rid of them.
lets not forgot the us has all its icbms, plus the sub lanched missless. and sub lanched missless are far more diffcult to take out. its why there used. so its not like a redunction in the number of warheads is gona screw the US over, and ideed, it may lead the way to starting a decomsoning proses to help meet the non prolfration treaty.