Look deeper into Milo's "discourse" and you probably won't like what you find. He uses untrue stereotypes of minorities and LGBT folk (yes he's all gay and shit but that obviously doesn't excuse it) to make mean-spirited jokes about "tolerance" gone amok, and sell his message, which is summarized in two points:
1. The leftist whites ("cucks"), and their multi-ethnic friends, are out to exterminate whites in "race war". 2. The leftists are policing language in an attempt to silence the white people who are opposed to this "race war".
These things are not only grossly untrue, they are inflammatory. They are a deliberate twisting of American ideals into a victimization, to foment a race war. The people protesting him know what he's up to and are appalled by it.
Ask yourself why the protests of him always happen in the most ethnically diverse regions of the country. Do you think the people living there know less about race relations than people living in more homogenous areas? They are up his ass for a reason. It might be worth figuring out what that reason is.
And about violence - I've tried to make the distinction between the people holding the signs, who were peaceably gathered at UC Berkeley for hours, and the smaller group that showed up later intent on violence. If you are unwilling to make that distinction, that's a shame. Those people are all one big pile of "leftists" to you, is that it?
Well if you want to lump them together, then I think it's fair to lump the "right" in with the guy who shot up a mosque in Canada a couple weeks ago. The left ain't got nothin' on the violence perpetrated by the right. We could also walk that right back through the civil war if you like.
no subject
1. The leftist whites ("cucks"), and their multi-ethnic friends, are out to exterminate whites in "race war".
2. The leftists are policing language in an attempt to silence the white people who are opposed to this "race war".
These things are not only grossly untrue, they are inflammatory. They are a deliberate twisting of American ideals into a victimization, to foment a race war. The people protesting him know what he's up to and are appalled by it.
Ask yourself why the protests of him always happen in the most ethnically diverse regions of the country. Do you think the people living there know less about race relations than people living in more homogenous areas? They are up his ass for a reason. It might be worth figuring out what that reason is.
And about violence - I've tried to make the distinction between the people holding the signs, who were peaceably gathered at UC Berkeley for hours, and the smaller group that showed up later intent on violence. If you are unwilling to make that distinction, that's a shame. Those people are all one big pile of "leftists" to you, is that it?
Well if you want to lump them together, then I think it's fair to lump the "right" in with the guy who shot up a mosque in Canada a couple weeks ago. The left ain't got nothin' on the violence perpetrated by the right. We could also walk that right back through the civil war if you like.
I think it's better to make the distinction.