Babies and small children will walk up to a tiger without any awareness of the tiger posing as a threat. And, tigers being predators isn't a social construct. So, you have to take into account that there are stages of development going on as various internal systems are booting up or calibrating to the environment, to put it analogously.
Apes behave tribally, and this behavior is not a social construct. More importantly, that tribalism drives them to engage in war with other tribes that are in proximity. And we have those same qualities. So, this notion that race is just a social construct is a complete farce.
Rather, race is merely the abstraction we use to identify our collective identity. This tribalism is innate. And another way to put that is: Ethnocentricity.
Now, people can condition against this by exposure to other groups, and this is what multiculturalism does. However, this is a conditioned response.
You've adopted an ideology that holds this conditioning as some moral imperative. And I have no reason to accept that.
no subject
Apes behave tribally, and this behavior is not a social construct. More importantly, that tribalism drives them to engage in war with other tribes that are in proximity. And we have those same qualities. So, this notion that race is just a social construct is a complete farce.
Rather, race is merely the abstraction we use to identify our collective identity. This tribalism is innate. And another way to put that is: Ethnocentricity.
Now, people can condition against this by exposure to other groups, and this is what multiculturalism does. However, this is a conditioned response.
You've adopted an ideology that holds this conditioning as some moral imperative. And I have no reason to accept that.