[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 02:03 am (UTC)(link)

[identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
Bill in 2007: But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you’re a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have.

[identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
Image

[identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
The real problem is when you are as intellectually disadvantaged as O'Reilly it must be difficult to imagine any group of which you are a member having any sort of privilege.

God really hates stupid people. But Roops, in his beneficent kindness, still finds a place on the telly for them...well someone needs to tell folk in the red states what (& how) to think.

[identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Kristof has an interesting piece related to this.

~ ~ ~

Joshua Correll of the University of Colorado at Boulder has used an online shooter video game to try to measure these unconscious attitudes (you can play the game yourself (http://www.csun.edu/~dma/FPST/consent.html)). The player takes on the role of a police officer who is confronted with a series of images of white or black men variously holding guns or innocent objects such as wallets or cellphones. The aim is to shoot anyone with a gun while holstering your weapon in other cases.

Ordinary players (often university undergraduates) routinely shoot more quickly at black men than at white men, and are more likely to mistakenly shoot an unarmed black man than an unarmed white man.

I’m typical. The first time I took the test, years ago, I shot armed blacks in an average of 0.679 seconds while waiting slightly longer — 0.694 seconds — to shoot armed whites. I also holstered more quickly when confronted with unarmed whites than with unarmed blacks.

In effect, we have a more impulsive trigger finger when confronted by black men and are more cautious with whites. This is true of black players as well, apparently because they absorb the same cultural values as everyone else: Correll has found no statistically significant difference between the play of blacks and that of whites in the shooting game.

“There’s a whole culture that promotes this idea of aggressive young black men,” Correll notes. “In our minds, young black men are associated with danger.”


-- NYT (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/28/opinion/nicholas-kristof-is-everyone-a-little-bit-racist.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region)
Edited 2014-08-28 16:44 (UTC)

[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com 2014-08-28 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
This was an interesting statistic:

Image

[identity profile] warrickwilson.livejournal.com 2014-08-29 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
he's just an angry voice for people who can't speak for themselves or turn their misgivings into something reasonable. misleader and trickster.