You seem to be missing the point; I'm not arguing that you should believe in a deity, there's no evidence for that so it would be stupid. You're making a knowledge claim about the lack of a deity, and I'm arguing that you have insufficient evidence to make that claim. One either has to say that they do not have knowledge, but a belief, or that the question is outside the realm of knowledge and therefore not a question.

If you claim you "know" there is not deity, then you have all the same problems as someone who claims they "know" there is. That is, that you are making knowledge claims without evidence.