They aren't to you, but for many epistemological systems they are both.

Those systems can't produce a working pair of glasses. Being useful is important.

you have to be willing to accept you have neither for your position.

Which is fine, since I don't need any to say that there isn't a teapot. Again, that which has been asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. If you have none, then its just imagination.

You're doing a Dawkins, not holding yourself up to the same standards you hold others to.

Right. I'll just have to live with that! When someone shows me evidence of their deity, then I'll believe in it.