ext_308938 ([identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons 2014-07-01 01:23 am (UTC)

> It would mean that unions would no longer be the exclusive negotiators of these contracts with people,
> and we wouldn't have the free rider problem or the compelled union payment issue.

In right to work states, Non-union members must be included in the contracts that Unions negotiate. That is a free rider problem. What about right-to-work makes that go away?



(184 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.