You seem to always miss the point that they don't *have* to run the business
Conversely, the employees don't have to work at a religiously-oriented organization. Besides, the regulation comes from the government, who cannot infringe on religious beliefs by law. So the "you don't have to do it" argument doesn't hold weight here like it would if it were a private group imposing this.
If providing government mandated protections to their workers is against their religion then they can make a *choice* between their religion and their business.
That directly violates our Constitution, just so you know.
They are *choosing* to*force* their religion on their employees. I'm pretty sure people left England for the Americas for precisely this reason.
No, the religion is not forced on the employees. The employees are still able to purchase and consume contraceptives to their heart's desire.
Re: 1/2
Conversely, the employees don't have to work at a religiously-oriented organization. Besides, the regulation comes from the government, who cannot infringe on religious beliefs by law. So the "you don't have to do it" argument doesn't hold weight here like it would if it were a private group imposing this.
If providing government mandated protections to their workers is against their religion then they can make a *choice* between their religion and their business.
That directly violates our Constitution, just so you know.
They are *choosing* to*force* their religion on their employees. I'm pretty sure people left England for the Americas for precisely this reason.
No, the religion is not forced on the employees. The employees are still able to purchase and consume contraceptives to their heart's desire.