The Republicans are just playing politics, I think, and are simply being the anti-Obama on anything that he does that might get some traction with their base and maybe some independents.
If a Republican president had done the same deal, I don't think we would be hearing as much of this, or at least the volume wouldn't be so loud.
I think I see the move here to try to delegitimize the worst sort of pandering and the most cynical attempts at manipulating opinion, but I don't know if it will stick. This sort of thing does give a bad name to politics, I admit, which, after all, should be about people coming to terms about how to be governed, instead of attempts to bring "1984" to life, but I think people will probably always see it all as politics. It does make democracy harder, but I suppose this is our challenge.
Mid-term elections are coming up, and the GOP stands to gain majority in the Senate, too (God help us all). They are desperate for any scandal they can possibly dredge up. I mean, another Benghazi investigation? Really?
no subject
and are simply being the anti-Obama on anything
that he does that might get some traction with
their base and maybe some independents.
If a Republican president had done the same deal,
I don't think we would be hearing as much of this, or
at least the volume wouldn't be so loud.
no subject
no subject
far deeper than Obama.
no subject
sort of pandering and the most cynical attempts at manipulating
opinion, but I don't know if it will stick. This sort of thing does give
a bad name to politics, I admit, which, after all, should be about people
coming to terms about how to be governed, instead of attempts
to bring "1984" to life, but I think people will probably always
see it all as politics. It does make democracy harder, but I
suppose this is our challenge.
no subject
Haven't you watched House of Cards?
no subject