ext_85238 (
fizzyland.livejournal.com) wrote in
politicartoons2014-06-01 07:13 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
We will get in
Why conservatives are suddenly terrified of revolution
"Warren is quite correct: It is the rich who have made war against the 99 percent, not the other way around. They have dumped the tax burden onto the rest of us. They have shredded our social safety net and attacked our retirements. In their insatiable greed, they refuse even to consider raising the minimum wage for people who toil all day and can’t earn enough to feed their children. And they do everything in their power to block as many people from the polls as possible who might protest these conditions, while crushing the unions and any other countervailing forces that could fight to improve them.

The goal of this vicious war is to control all of the wealth and the government not just in the U.S., but the rest of the world, too, and to make sure the people are kept in a state of fear."
"Warren is quite correct: It is the rich who have made war against the 99 percent, not the other way around. They have dumped the tax burden onto the rest of us. They have shredded our social safety net and attacked our retirements. In their insatiable greed, they refuse even to consider raising the minimum wage for people who toil all day and can’t earn enough to feed their children. And they do everything in their power to block as many people from the polls as possible who might protest these conditions, while crushing the unions and any other countervailing forces that could fight to improve them.

The goal of this vicious war is to control all of the wealth and the government not just in the U.S., but the rest of the world, too, and to make sure the people are kept in a state of fear."
no subject
So, you taking everything I said to mean cat calling is of your own doing as you specifically omitted my disclaimers to reach that conclusion.
A quick impromptu micro-date, whether initiated by a man or woman, isn't an act of aggression as there is no malicious aforethought. It is highly disingenuous for you to color it as such.
It is your dishonesty that leads me to believe you're sexually repressed, not your concerns for ensuring that women are treated respectfully.
no subject
Who said anything about you being malicious? At worst, you're probably just a dope.
Plus, a lot of women really aren't interested in your idea of guys engaging them in spontaneous/unsolicited "impromptu micro-dates." They especially don't like it because you're not the only person who feels that there's nothing wrong with said micro-dates, and they're generally not interested in multiple guys trying to engage them every day when they have no interest in any of them.
no subject
no subject
My real world experiences negate everything you're saying. That doesn't mean there isn't *some* truth behind what you're saying. But, you're being presumptuous about what women do and do not want. I'm only expressing my desires and allowing women to respond accordingly. And I respect their desires. It's a very simple, comfortable, and open exchange. There is nothing for me to be ashamed of.
Now why is there such conflict between what I'm experiencing and what you're saying? I'd say there is more to this than you're willing to admit.
So, either keep telling yourself what you want to hear, or go put yourself out there with the right attitude, but I doubt you could be honest with it anyways. Personally, I don't care what you do. Hell, you might even get cheered on by the choir around here.
And, let me be very clear, your self-righteous attitude isn't going to change my real world experiences no matter how much you try to "shame" me or how many passive-aggressive snide comments you throw at me. This sort of bitterness can't be healthy for you.
no subject
Or you live in a fog of delirium where women love your flirty "I say what I want when I want and the women love it" ways.
no subject
Oh. My. Gawd, a concession! That was harder than pulling teeth. You'd think you could have just agreed with this point up front.... Instead you attacked people's sexuality and squirmed like a stuck pig.
I'd say there is more to this than you're willing to admit.
This again. Right back to your mind reading skills. You don't know your audience, quit making an ass out of yourself by assuming.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But if I'm being told I have to default assume no woman ever wants me to ever make any sort of romantic advances towards her, well, it'd just re-enforce my already troubling self-doubts.
I don't see why making a pass at someone on a bus or subway is wrong--however it is wrong to continue making a pass at someone who has made it clear they are not interested. Be it on public transit or anywhere else.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Until you know a woman well enough to make a decision that factors in what you believe her viewpoint would be, that's a good start.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The tigron_x dude asserts that all women consider all his advances complimentary at all times. Anyone who tells him that's not true is met with "your dick is small" type arguments.
Pick a side.
no subject
I do not assert that all women consider advances from anyone to be complimentary. I assert that we shouldn't assume 100% of advances are unwanted--but we need to be wary of making an advance towards someone who is rejecting it.
"pick a side"
What are you, a Sith? You are either with me or against me? It's not a simple dichotomy where I either agree with a nutso MRA or I need to feel guilty for wanting to talk to the cute woman on the bus.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I get that you're a proud sexual predator, but you need to acknowledge that others don't ALWAYS want to be the game. Often not...
no subject
no subject
I have put no words in your mouth. You want me to back off? Clearly acknowledge that there are times when not approaching is the appropriate thing (most strangers most setting, imo). Clearly acknowledge that not everyone wants to be hit on at all times.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I would agree it is an intrusion if it's made clear that it is unwanted, but how do I know if the woman in the park who has made eye contact with me a few times, smiled, and is sitting there reading a book will feel like I am *intruding* if I walk up, say hello, and attempt to initiate a conversation that I would want to end with a date?
I think there's a problem with assuming that all attempts to "hit-on" (to use a colloquial phrase with some odd literal implications) someone is an intrusion, even a micro-intrusion, of someones space.
I mean, until you are given an indication that it is unwanted, are you (or more accurately, am I, a male) supposed to expect any advances to be unwanted?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
That is minimal acceptable behaviour..
You need to need to use your judgement.
I mean, until you are given an indication that it is unwanted, are you (or more accurately, am I, a male) supposed to expect any advances to be unwanted?
I am a male. I want to put my penis in your orifice. Is there ever a moment in your life when its just not appropriate for me to ask you? Are there moments in your life where it is okay for me to ask you? If 30 guys asked you in one day, would you find that annoying?
Use your empathy dude.
no subject
Horrible show, too.
no subject
no subject