ext_25420 ([identity profile] hardblue.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons2014-04-22 07:19 pm

Affirmative Action Goes Down 6-2



It looks like the Supreme Court has subjected affirmative action to majoritarian politics, which is always a great way to protect minority interests.

Wire.com

New York Times

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't blame the Constitution for your beliefs.

My beliefs are rooted in the Constitution here from a policy standpoint. This might be why you're struggling with this.

As shown by its history, the Constitution can support such diverse and contrary policies as slavery and affirmative action, depending on the era and its people

I wouldn't agree with that.

You may accept invidious racism as acceptable

I also wouldn't agree with that.

It may be worth your while to stick to what I actually believe, and not whatever fantasy you're peddling here.

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 09:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you accept businessmen, say restaurateurs, denying service on the basis of race? Yes or no?

Do I accept them doing it, or do I accept their right to do so? Depending on what your question is impacts what the answer is.

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not really drawing complications, as the complications are already drawn and you're ignoring them. Are you asking whether I accept the outcome, or do I accept the rights exist that have outcomes that I may not prefer?

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
And yet you only seem to care about one outcome, as opposed to perhaps all of them. Why is that?

[identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting how difficult it is to get a simple yes or no answer, isn't it?

Also, asking questions while refusing to answer previously posed questions should receive some kind of internet penalty.

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
When a question is unclear, a clarification is in order. Seeing as it's not a simple yes or no as the implications are unclear...

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Because it's such an ugly outcome, Jeff, and as I have told you before, I know what if feels like to be diminished like that.

Okay, but, for the umpteenth time, there are ugly outcomes in both directions. You can favor one over the other as can I, but we're both pushing for ugly outcomes. With that reality, we have to ask which outcome is more beneficial, and, really, what outcome is more likely.

. I know you don't believe that racism exists anymore, or at least that is what you like to say, but that is just another reflection of your strange thought patterns.

Also not my position. This might actually be the root of your problem here.

[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com 2014-04-23 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Umm, what's the ugly outcome in the other direction?? Having to look at a colored person in your restaurant who isn't just mopping the floors?

The ugly outcomes are many. Freedom of association in any direction. Pushback against minority-only establishments, safe space establishments, etc. Just to name a few.

I would fault you or impugn your character for disagreeing with me, but I will say that I don't believe you've thought about it quite as much as you might think.

You keep dancing around, which I can understand, considering how untasty some of your thoughts are

I'm not dancing at all, I'm simply not going to take a position that I don't hold. This isn't debate club, and I'm happy to correct you when you misstate my positions.

You don't recall saying that racism no longer exists in this country in this century?

"Racism is delegated to the fringe of society" is not "racism no longer exists."