ext_79277 ([identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons 2014-02-23 09:33 pm (UTC)

...it's my claim that November to December was significant.

Less than 0.1Mbps. A higher limit of 100Kbps. Less than 12.5KBps. Well within the monthly variance shown on your graph.


My claim is that December was significantly lower than November.

Less than 0.1Mbps. A higher limit of 100Kbps. Less than 12.5KBps. Well within the monthly variance shown on your graph.


If this were a climate change discussion you would be handwaving the September-November change as an aberration and calling December a return to near-normal, as it is not significantly lower than normal - look at the red line (http://i.imgur.com/tijZBiJ.jpg), as a statistician would. 2.14Mbps in August to 2.12Mbps in December. 0.02Mbps. 20Kbps. 2.5KBps. Significant? No. December to January? 2.14Mbps to 1.82Mbps. 0.32Mbps. 320Kbps. 40KBps. Significant? Yes.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting