ext_79277 ([identity profile] lafinjack.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons 2014-02-23 08:28 pm (UTC)

Comcast did it for one type of traffic mostly due to facilitation of copyright infringement issues. It was a very specific type due to a very specific reason.

So you're saying instead of reporting users who were most likely breaking the law, they instead reduced their culpability instead of completely negating it? Abetting their customers in breaking the law only a little instead of a lot?


Verizon's problems existed before and after the law changed. There's nothing correlating the two.

Your own graph disproves that.


Impossible to say as I'm not on the AWS end.

What's a likely non-ISP-throttling reason?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting