We're going in circles. It doesn't equate anything. That's all happening in your own mind, not in the image. It's a juxtaposition -- a simple one, granted -- to illustrate that legal trickery to achieve an end is a double-edged sword. It also doesn't matter whether they're equal or not. They're both legal, and until that changes, any weight you or anyone else applies to either issue is irrelevant in this context especially since neither is outlawing their respective products or services. It's not that I don't want to have the discussion, it's that it's not applicable here. I thought there was something I was missing and hoped you could articulate it in a way that made sense to me, but I guess I was wrong.
That's all happening in your own mind, not in the image. It's a juxtaposition -- a simple one, granted -- to illustrate that legal trickery to achieve an end is a double-edged sword.
I guess we fundamentally disagree on whether a juxtaposition equates two things, then.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
I guess we fundamentally disagree on whether a juxtaposition equates two things, then.
no subject