And if they take away a woman's right to privacy in medical decisions at the federal level? I think that's far more of a direct threat than what local politicians are doing within the confines of the five boroughs of NYC. I don't think that they can see the forest through the trees. That's the joke.
As I said, I don't like either. But Bloomberg and the matriarchs dictating onerous personal bans on a local level was solvable for me. The soda thing isn't the first ban - This all started with Giuliani's 'quality of life' thing in the '90s. (Another Republican swimming with Democrats.)
And what I'm saying about Palin is absolutely true. She did not know that Roe v Wade was about privacy. When asked during an interview, she advocated overturning Roe v Wade with one breath, and with the next stated that she absolutely believed in the right to privacy, with none of her misfiring synapses making a connection between the two. It was absolutely stunning.
no subject
As I said, I don't like either. But Bloomberg and the matriarchs dictating onerous personal bans on a local level was solvable for me. The soda thing isn't the first ban - This all started with Giuliani's 'quality of life' thing in the '90s. (Another Republican swimming with Democrats.)
And what I'm saying about Palin is absolutely true. She did not know that Roe v Wade was about privacy. When asked during an interview, she advocated overturning Roe v Wade with one breath, and with the next stated that she absolutely believed in the right to privacy, with none of her misfiring synapses making a connection between the two. It was absolutely stunning.