ext_39051 (
telemann.livejournal.com) wrote in
politicartoons2013-02-28 10:15 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)

Several news reports described a collective gasp in the court when Justice Scalia made his statement. Rachel Maddow's coverage (she was in the court for the oral arguments) and shows a clip from President Johnson's speech proposing the Voting Rights Act. In that speech, Johnson cited specific examples of voter repression, some of which should sound familiar since they're STILL occurring.
no subject
I don’t think there is anything to be gained by any Senator to vote against continuation of this act
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now he didn't. Which suggests to me that he heard the testimony and drew the conclusion that the ENTIRETY of the Senate did that the act is still warranted. And that is to his credit. But don't pretend that he'd have seriously jeopardized his seat by making a state's right case that the act was unduly burdening Alabama.
no subject
no subject
Interesting.