It would be more likely to be the other way around. Consider every simulation we have produced so far. The Sims, Minecraft, MMORPGs, Flow, and so on. In all of these, the basic properties of three dimensional space and linear time are they keystones, right? However, in each of these, things are possible, by coding, hacks or glitches, which clearly defy these parameters. These things are not possible in what we may consider the 'real' world.
It's the Matrix effect. If it were possible to simulate reality perfectly, it is also possible to introduce scenarios that defy the rules of the simulation. Whereas you cannot defy the rules of 'reality' in the same way. It is even possible to model n-dimensional space in computer simulations, whereas our 'middle world' perception (or possibly the 3-brane in which our universe is enveloped) forbids us from experiencing anything beyond three spacial dimensions and one time dimension.
So, given the statistical probability that our universe is a simulation, we should be able to see evidence of glitches, hacks and/or coding errors that defy the rules of the system. We have not been able to scientifically measure or record anything that contravenes the known laws of physics, therefore it may be stated with reasonable confidence that the simulation hypothesis is either untrue, or we are the first reality from which all other simulations may eventually arise.
no subject
It's the Matrix effect. If it were possible to simulate reality perfectly, it is also possible to introduce scenarios that defy the rules of the simulation. Whereas you cannot defy the rules of 'reality' in the same way. It is even possible to model n-dimensional space in computer simulations, whereas our 'middle world' perception (or possibly the 3-brane in which our universe is enveloped) forbids us from experiencing anything beyond three spacial dimensions and one time dimension.
So, given the statistical probability that our universe is a simulation, we should be able to see evidence of glitches, hacks and/or coding errors that defy the rules of the system. We have not been able to scientifically measure or record anything that contravenes the known laws of physics, therefore it may be stated with reasonable confidence that the simulation hypothesis is either untrue, or we are the first reality from which all other simulations may eventually arise.