http://aurocard.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] aurocard.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons2012-12-21 09:48 pm

[identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Nice to see you still attacking people even when they're taking your side.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
Why should someone be guarded from criticism in one aspect simply because their points align in another?

[identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 08:49 am (UTC)(link)
I never said or implied that they should. But when the aspect you're criticizing is completely unrelated to the aspect being discussed, it's nothing but a pointless ad hominem.

[identity profile] new-wave-witch.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't agree. The character of someone whose opinion or work is the focus of a post is relevant.
Edited 2012-12-23 16:14 (UTC)

[identity profile] farchivist.livejournal.com 2012-12-24 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Incorrect. The character and/or failings of the person making the opinion are always relevant.

[identity profile] lilenth.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
The creators of penny arcade are nowhere near "my side".

[identity profile] madscience.livejournal.com 2012-12-23 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
So you're for a culture of violence? Or you agree with the NRA that media censorship is the way to change that culture?
Edited 2012-12-23 19:52 (UTC)

[identity profile] lilenth.livejournal.com 2012-12-24 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I just disagree with a pair of privileged nitwits who don't really know jack squat.