In regards to debate performance, and style versus substance for a presidential debate and who "won? Yeah, Nixon and Kennedy? Yeah, don't kid yourself Obama won because he had substance (I don't think he had much fight in him at all). And it doesn't Romney was wrong or lying or doing a live-etch-a-sketch transfomation. The entire debate was geared to "low information" voters in swing states. Most of them wouldn't know about Bowles-Simpson if they ran over it with their car. There were mind numbing moments where Obama just got so lost and the weeds over wonky stuff and missing the big picture. And substance? Seriously the President's substance sandwich could have used some serious beefing up, he never mentioned the private sector job increase, and let lots of golden moments slide by (Romney chiding the President for green investment money "Where you invest a lot of money says a lot about the person." REALLY? Obama didn't pursue that golden opportunity. Or Bain? And they didn't have to be personal attacks.
Looks like to me Obama's advisers thought his "nice guy image" and likeability numbers are so high, he just had to play defense. Why the hell would Obama's closing statement (something he's known for months to prepare for) be so defeatist and be essentially "I know I'm not a perfect man, and I've made mistakes, something that Governor Romney would agree with?"
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
telemann.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
politicartoons2012-10-03 08:50 pm
no subject
Even PBS, whose funding he straight out said he plans to cut off, went, kneejerk, for style over substance.
Idiocracy indeed.
no subject
no subject
no subject
In regards to debate performance, and style versus substance for a presidential debate and who "won? Yeah, Nixon and Kennedy? Yeah, don't kid yourself Obama won because he had substance (I don't think he had much fight in him at all). And it doesn't Romney was wrong or lying or doing a live-etch-a-sketch transfomation. The entire debate was geared to "low information" voters in swing states. Most of them wouldn't know about Bowles-Simpson if they ran over it with their car. There were mind numbing moments where Obama just got so lost and the weeds over wonky stuff and missing the big picture. And substance? Seriously the President's substance sandwich could have used some serious beefing up, he never mentioned the private sector job increase, and let lots of golden moments slide by (Romney chiding the President for green investment money "Where you invest a lot of money says a lot about the person." REALLY? Obama didn't pursue that golden opportunity. Or Bain? And they didn't have to be personal attacks.
Looks like to me Obama's advisers thought his "nice guy image" and likeability numbers are so high, he just had to play defense. Why the hell would Obama's closing statement (something he's known for months to prepare for) be so defeatist and be essentially "I know I'm not a perfect man, and I've made mistakes, something that Governor Romney would agree with?"
WTF dude, Dumb move.