Allegedly. The similarity is that in both cases, we have only the killer's word that the victim was in any way suspicious.
Oh please; you were in the military and you know there's constant SIGINT on all that, more video footage then you would find in a 50-year-old peeping tom's collection. You're just ticked off because you don't get a look at the classified intel and you can't make the government show it to you.
no subject
The similarity is that in both cases, we have only the killer's word that the victim was in any way suspicious.
Oh please; you were in the military and you know there's constant SIGINT on all that, more video footage then you would find in a 50-year-old peeping tom's collection. You're just ticked off because you don't get a look at the classified intel and you can't make the government show it to you.