ext_90803 ([identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons 2012-03-23 04:52 pm (UTC)

I don't see what I'm not considering here. She's not entitled to any specific benefits in this scenario, her actual pay doesn't change, and you're still insisting it's essentially a dock in pay because she may choose to spend some of her actual pay on something previously covered by her insurance.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting