I am glad you agree the opposition to this insurance/birth control mandate is silly.
The relevant topic here IS whether someone or some organization is allowed to be "exempt" from federal laws if they can claim a religious issue with it. Now I think that's a bunch of shit, and not just because the "morality" trolling about the law in question first came from an organization that has systematically covered up the rape of children.
As for my hypothetical, remove the toddler aspect, and simply focus on the 20 hours a day and M&M salary part, and it's still unacceptable. But the same logic I used there is the logic being used in this real-life case.
And I also will refrain from getting into how people like Rush don't even know how birth control works, and barely seem to understand how the concept of insurance works either.
no subject
The relevant topic here IS whether someone or some organization is allowed to be "exempt" from federal laws if they can claim a religious issue with it. Now I think that's a bunch of shit, and not just because the "morality" trolling about the law in question first came from an organization that has systematically covered up the rape of children.
As for my hypothetical, remove the toddler aspect, and simply focus on the 20 hours a day and M&M salary part, and it's still unacceptable. But the same logic I used there is the logic being used in this real-life case.
And I also will refrain from getting into how people like Rush don't even know how birth control works, and barely seem to understand how the concept of insurance works either.