What If MoveOn.org Existed 65 Years Ago?

[fleaplus.livejournal.com]

WW2/Iraq comparisons of course have all manner of caveats attached, but I still thought this was rather amusing:

http://redstate.com/stories/war/what_if_moveon_org_existed_65_years_ago

Comments

[j0kerr.livejournal.com]

A) No shit, I found some more for you. These are from the leaders of the democrats instead of news articles quotes.

B) They do show how they have reached their conclusions with considering Petraeus. You just want to ignore it.

C) It is a straw man because I listen to the politicians of the left so I know what they are saying, thus the quotes.

D) If you can find Democrat leaders who admit the Petraeus is telling the truth, yes I would have to admit that they are hearing the truths, but then still acting against them.

[j0kerr.livejournal.com]

A) Cool. Sorry for swearing.

B) The quotes show that they are unwilling to listen to anything but what they want to hear. Remember, what someone sees/interprets becomes reality. If I interpret their quotes this way there are more who do as well.

C) Yes, the left does consist of more than its representatives but its their representatives that have the power, not the rest of the group.

D) Agreed, please find an argument from a mainstream left representative that looks at what Petraeus has presented.

[j0kerr.livejournal.com]

Cool...now its 8:21 on a Friday night..go out. I shoudn't hear from you till Sunday.

[j0kerr.livejournal.com]

These may be arguments that look like they have something to back them up but they are all biased arguments that use the word "may" a lot and speculate on defintions. Hell, #5 basically saying that Bush is more of danger to the country than Al Qaeda.

No go have fun, its the weekend.

[j0kerr.livejournal.com]

But I have to stop its 1:26am here, I'm in Ireland. Really tired...but, yes you did prove that there are arguments, no matter how flimsy I think they are.