ext_308938 ([identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] politicartoons 2014-07-02 03:20 am (UTC)

> those workers who opt out need to be removed from the situation.

What does that mean? Not covered by the union contract?


You realize this is the OPPOSITE of "right-to-work" legislation? Unions are legally required to represent nonmember employees the same as members. Efforts by a union to restrict the beneficial contract terms to their own members, or to exclude non-members from the shop in general, are exactly what right-To-Work legislation is aimed at preventing.




Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting