[identity profile] bikinisquad3000.livejournal.com 2012-10-04 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
It was a a weird, disheartening experience for me. I barely saw any of it because I was looking up their assertions the whole time, so mostly I was just hearing it. To me Romney came off as rude, repetitive, dishonest, and yet again doing 180s on his own positions, and Obama came off as somewhat less rude, more substantiative, less dishonest (you take what you can get) and kind of appalled at Romney. Then I sat in for the post-debate analysis on PBS and all they talked about was how Romney crushed it because he looked happier to be there and looked at the camera more. It wasn't until "Charlie Rose" came on that anyone mentioned what they talked about for more than five seconds at a time, it seemed like.

Forgot to say, worst part: the guy who said that during a debate you should really turn the sound off for a moment and see how the candidates look to get a real feel of how it's going. Honestly!
Edited 2012-10-04 12:46 (UTC)

[identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com 2012-10-04 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly.

Even PBS, whose funding he straight out said he plans to cut off, went, kneejerk, for style over substance.

Idiocracy indeed.

[identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com 2012-10-04 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you seriously just compare Romney to.. Kennedy?